A one-year follow-up study of ocular and systemic complications of intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (Avastin).

OBJECTIVES To report systemic and ocular complications within a year of intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (Avastin) in ocular neovascularisation. METHODS The quasi-experimental (randomized without control) study was carried out at the Eye Department of Abbasi Shaheed Hospital, Karachi, from July 2008 to June 2010. It comprised 150 patients selected from the outpatient department with ocular neovascularisation through non-probability purposive sampling. After detailed history and examination, the patients were counseled for intravitreal injection Avastin (bevacjzumab) which was injected into the vitreous cavity in sterile environment in the operation theatre using fully aseptic technique. The injection site was compressed for several seconds to avoid reflux when the needle was removed. Paracentesis was done following the injection as soon as possible. Patients were discharged on moxifloxcin eye drops and steroid antibiotic combination ointment at night time. They were followed up the very next day, after 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year. Injection was repeated after 6 weeks if required and further repetition was done again after 6 weeks according to the need of the patient. RESULTS Of the 150 patients, 93 (62%) were males and 57 (38%) were females. Most commonly presenting age group was between 50-60 years (n=51; 34%) followed by 41-50 years (n=41; 27.4%). Most common indication for intravitreal injection Avastin (bevacizumab) was proliferative diabetic retinopathy in 134 (89.33%) patients, followed by age-related macular degeneration (wet type) in 5 (3.3%) patients. Most frequently presenting ocular complication was subconjunctival haemorrhage seen in 35 (23%) patients, followed by regurgitation of drug from the site of injection in 8 (5.3%) patients, transient rise of intraocular pressure in 7 (4.7%) patients, mild uveitiS in 4 (2.7%) patients, lens injury in 3 (2%) patients, conjunctival chemosis and iatrogenic vitreous haemorrhage in 1 (0.7%) patients. Among the systemic complications were acute rise of blood pressure in 4 (2.7%) patients, and mild irritation and allergic reaction on skin in 1 (0.7%) patient. CONCLUSION Avastin is generally a safe drug for treatment of ocular neovascularization. The complications reported were more associated with the technique of the procedure and not the drug itself and were easily manageable. Drug-related complications were limited, transient and easily managed with treatment.